How we read what candidates tell us.

Reports are written by candidates who chose to share. They are not representative of everyone who sat the exam, and we never predict your result.

Accounts from successful and unsuccessful candidates are gathered and presented with equal care.

Whether someone passed is one field. How well we could verify their account is a separate grade.

Each finding's denominator is the number of reports that discussed that topic. Reports that didn't mention it are excluded, not counted as disagreement.

Findings are shown as plain counts, such as “2 of 41”. No current finding shows a percentage, and a percentage would never be shown when fewer than 10 accounts are eligible.

If a report doesn't say something, we record it as unknown rather than guessing.

We separate when the exam was taken from when the account was posted, and mark dates as exact or approximate.

Findings never mix reports from different exam versions.

The same candidate posting in several places is counted once.

What the official exam content outline says is kept distinct from what candidates felt.

We never reproduce live exam questions — only broad experience categories.

Mock scores are tied to the provider the candidate named, split by first attempt and retake, and never presented as a passing line.